The clock is arithmetic
Every statutory date on a case is counted from the dates on that case, under the provision that imposes it. Nobody should be keeping five dates per case in their head, and nobody should learn one has passed at a hearing.
A working desk for a police unit: the statutory clock counted from the dates on your own cases, the sections quoted from the Sanhitas so you can read them yourself, exhibits fingerprinted at the door, and the money followed hop by hop while it can still be frozen. Built for the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, the Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and the Sakshya Adhiniyam, in English, हिन्दी and বাংলা.
It removes the part of the work that is arithmetic, retrieval and remembering — and it is honest about the difference.
Every statutory date on a case is counted from the dates on that case, under the provision that imposes it. Nobody should be keeping five dates per case in their head, and nobody should learn one has passed at a hearing.
When a section is proposed you are shown the words of the Act as we hold them, with the citation. Where we cannot produce the provision we say so and send you to the bare Act, rather than filling the gap with something fluent.
The IPC, the CrPC and the Evidence Act were replaced on 1 July 2024. Ask about an old section and you are told where the provision went, not handed a dead one that still reads correctly.
This is the actual sequence, in the order it happens at a station.
Type what the person told you, in their words. You get back whether it looks cognisable, non-cognisable or somebody else's jurisdiction — each meaning a different thing to do next — the sections that appear to apply quoted from the Sanhita, the questions to ask before they leave, and anything that cannot wait: a medical examination, footage that will be overwritten tomorrow.
Register from the same screen and the statutory obligations are dated automatically. Confirm the gravity and they are recalculated, because the clock depends on how serious the offence is and no software should guess that.
A fraud is not a burglary. A cyber-enabled fraud has no scene to secure; it has a beneficiary account emptying by the hour. The desk puts the freeze steps first — NCRP and 1930, the nodal-officer letter, KYC for the beneficiary account — because those are the ones with a clock on them.
A file is fingerprinted as it arrives and stored under that fingerprint, so it cannot be altered afterwards. Months later anyone can ask whether it is still the same file and get a yes or a no. Text is machine-read out of it in Bengali, Hindi and English, so a stack of seizure memos becomes searchable.
Record the transfers and the trail shows what left the complainant's account, where it went, and which accounts nothing has left yet. It reports what she actually lost separately from the sum of every hop — because those are different numbers, and only one of them belongs in front of a court.
Before a chargesheet the file is checked against what it either has or does not: statements, the section 63 certificates, an unbroken chain of custody, no date passed. Each line says what was found, not what might be missing.
These are decisions, not gaps waiting to be filled. They stay made however good the technology gets.
It will not score a person for how likely they are to offend, rank people by suspicion, or predict who will commit a crime. If a supplier offers your unit one of these, ask them what happens to the person it is wrong about.
Nothing here decides an arrest, a charge, or a guilt. Every classification says in terms that it is a reading and not a decision, and that the station house officer decides.
A person exists on this platform because a case put them there. There is no searchable population, and a supervising officer's question about whether a number appears on another case in the same unit is written to the audit log before it is answered.
One unit cannot see another's cases, exhibits or people. That isolation is enforced at the server, not in the screen, and it is tested on every release.
Deployed first in West Bengal, so this is not decoration.
Navigation, case tabs and the screens an officer fills in — এফআইআর নম্বর, ঘটনাস্থল, ধারা — switch with one button in the sidebar, not buried in a settings page.
A photographed seizure memo in Bengali is machine-read so it can be found later by a word or a number on it. The accurate models are used, because a misread digit in an evidence document is a wrong person.
Machine-read text is labelled machine-read everywhere it appears. It is a way to find a document; it is never a substitute for reading the exhibit.
Inside the portal, every unit gets a set of primers written for an officer who has not been trained in any of this and should not have to ask. Each says what the technique is, what it proves and — the part that decides cases — what it does not prove.
What a hash proves about an exhibit, and what it says nothing about. A forged document has a perfectly good fingerprint.
Layering, mule accounts, and why registering the FIR does not stop the money — registration is a legal step and the freeze is a banking one.
Why an electronic record needs one, why it cannot be added quietly later, and why it is the first objection the defence takes.
What CDR, subscriber details and IPDR each prove, and why nobody gets an extension on a retention period that has expired.
No case file, no data, no procurement conversation. A demonstration unit with worked cases already in it.
A station that already has a registered case, exhibits, a money trail and a statutory clock running, so you can see the whole shape in ten minutes.
Your state, district, station and the officer in command. Nothing about a case, a complainant or an accused — that is not our business and we do not want it.
For a district or a commissionerate, or where a specialist — digital forensics, a cyber examiner — has to be part of it, speak to the team directly.